Prepaid

Order Form

    This individual Report Murphy’s Law and the CFPB: The Proposed Prepaid Rule Won’t Protect Anyone is available for purchase. This Report is available to members of Mercator Advisory Group’s Prepaid Advisory Service. Please be advised that this Report is normally part of a research and advisory service that provides ongoing support throughout the year. As such, this Report contains significant depth of content that is selected for its strategic importance to our members. (For a description of these services, see our Advisory Services section).

    While the Report represents significant analyst time invested, there is no means of our ascertaining if it will fully meet your specific intended purposes. Typically, these Reports form the basis for future discussions with our clients where we are able to fine-tune additional information that we have gathered in the construction of the series of Reports (or locate new information rapidly due to our exclusive focus on gathering information in the payments industry) for specific member needs.

    Unfortunately, in fairness to our paying members, we are not able to offer this level of support for a single Report purchase. We will, however, credit any Research Document purchase against the future purchase price of the service should you become a member within 30 days of purchasing the document.

    The price for individual Report purchases is $2450 per document. 

     

    Use the form below to request this individual Report purchase or

    Click here for a fax-back order form

     

     

     

Murphy’s Law and the CFPB: The Proposed Prepaid Rule Won’t Protect Anyone

There’s still time to comment to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Proposed Prepaid Rule

Research from Mercator Advisory Group discusses possible pitfalls in CFBP’s proposed new rule for prepaid cards

Video Press Release

Members Only – Executive Summary


This research from Mercator Advisory Group provides an analysis of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposed prepaid rule, now in its comment period. The provisions of the nearly 900-page rule seek to increase consumer protections for users of open-loop prepaid cards of all types.

Mercator Advisory Group’s research report, titled Murphy’s Law and the CFPB: The Proposed Prepaid Rule Won’t Protect Anyone, identifies several areas of concern for prepaid providers and cardholders. Because of the breadth and depth of the prepaid regulations, the report highlights certain provisions likely to cause confusion or have other negative consequences, including unintended consequences that ultimately would harm consumers by making a convenient financial tool less available and making the surviving products more confusing. The intention of this report is to give prepaid providers starting points for their own analysis of how the rules might affect their cardholders and businesses.

This report encourages providers of prepaid cards, and their partners and cardholders, to comment on the rules by the March 23 deadline. It suggests strategies for crafting comments, and offers suggestions in the text on how the rules should be adjusted.

"While the rule contains good ideas that could benefit providers and card shoppers, there are several provisions that would actually reduce consumer protections," comments Ben Jackson, director of Mercator Advisory Group's Prepaid Advisory Service, and author of the report.

This report has 19 pages and 3 exhibits.

Members of Mercator Advisory Group's Prepaid Advisory Service have access to this report as well as the upcoming research for the year ahead, presentations, analyst access, and other membership benefits.

Highlights of the report include:

  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has released a proposed prepaid rule two years after an advance notice of rulemaking and has asked the payments industry to respond in 90 days. 

  • The 869-page rule is nearly three times as long as the rules that implemented Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and is loaded with unintended consequences.

  • The rule would lead to less access and more confusion for prepaid customers, thus harming the consumers it is designed to protect.

  • The rule also would pull new types of payments companies under the prepaid umbrella and lead to further confusion and frustration among consumers. 

  • Prepaid providers should comment on the rules to address how individual provisions will harm their cardholders and propose alternative rules.